Independent. Editor-owned. Built for people who still want the record.

By Michael Starr Hopkins

The courtroom is public.

The money is not.

Marc Elias posted that Elias Law Group is litigating 83 voting and election cases in 44 states, including D.C. The same firm says it moved to intervene in all 22 Trump DOJ voter-data lawsuits filed since September 2025.

Now put that next to the money side. ProPublica lists The 85 Fund at roughly $169 million in 2024 revenue. InfluenceWatch gives the exact figure: $168,530,018. The Brennan Center says dark-money groups, nonprofits, and shell companies put more than $1.9 billion into the 2024 federal cycle.

Source label: Marc Elias public post and Elias Law Group press release.

This is not a complaint that one side has lawyers and the other side does not. Both sides do.

This is the harder problem: election law now runs through a courtroom economy where the public can see the case caption but often cannot see the full donor chain behind the legal machine.

The pitch is always transparency. The structure is often anonymity. That is the trick.

The docket tells you who filed. It tells you which judge has the case. It tells you which statute is being fought over. It tells you which state got sued and which group intervened.

That is useful. It is also incomplete.

Because the voter still cannot answer the question that matters: who is paying for the legal war over their vote?

The deep cut is The 85 Fund. InfluenceWatch describes the Honest Elections Project as a project of The 85 Fund. ProPublica's nonprofit data shows The 85 Fund's 2024 revenue at about $169 million. InfluenceWatch's 2024 budget table lists $168,530,018 in revenue and $169,654,423 in expenses.

Source label: ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer, InfluenceWatch, and Brennan Center 2024 dark-money analysis.

This is not inside-baseball legal drama.

Election law decides whether your registration gets challenged. Whether your ballot gets counted. Whether your county gets sued. Whether your state gets forced to hand over voter data. Whether the rules are written by elected officials, judges, private lawyers, or donors who never have to put their name on the filing.

The courtroom gives the fight a seal of legitimacy. The dark-money system gives it a mask.

The public fight is about election integrity, voting access, fraud, voter files, rules, deadlines, mail ballots, registration, and who gets to define a legal vote.

The private fight is about power: who can pay for enough litigation to shape the rules before voters ever get to the polls.

That is why the donor question matters. A lawsuit can be public and still leave the voter blind about who benefits from the outcome.

This fight needs investigators, organizers, lawyers, data people, policy writers, local reporters, and designers who can turn records into pressure.

The 2026 election will be litigated by named law firms and funded through nonprofit machinery that often keeps the donor chain hidden.

The 85 Fund booked $168,530,018 in 2024 revenue. Elias Law Group says it is litigating 83 voting and election cases in 44 states including D.C. Dark money hit more than $1.9 billion in 2024.

You can see the courtroom. You cannot see the check.

One action: The next time somebody says they are fighting for election integrity, ask the basic question: who paid for the fight?

Forward this to one person who needs the record before the spin gets comfortable.

Read Burn the Playbook for politics that starts where people actually live: the bill, the school, the job, the clinic, the courtroom, and the neighborhood.

Manage preferences: {{subscriber_preferences_url}} | Unsubscribe: {{unsubscribe_url}}