Washington, D.C.Sunday, May 17, 2026

Voting Rights · Supreme Court

BURN THE PLAYBOOK

Issue #33 · Part 1 of 2 · May 17, 2026

They're Not Rewriting History. They're Replaying It.

A SCOTUS ruling. A Jan 6 plaintiff. A 78-year-old who didn't know his name was on the case. Sixty years of Black voting power, unwound on schedule.

Six robed Supreme Court justices hoist a Confederate battle flag while a heavy gavel crushes a federal-statute scroll labeled FEDERAL STATUTE at their feet. Engraving-style editorial cartoon.
The Callais majority and the flag they brought with them. Editorial illustration.

The Sentence

They're not hiding it anymore.

Open The Callais Opinion (PDF) Read The Companion Investigation

Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court ended the Voting Rights Act.

They did not say so out loud. They never do. They said the State of Louisiana could not draw a second majority-Black congressional district to remedy a Section 2 violation that a federal court had already ordered the state to remedy. They said it 6 to 3. They said it in an opinion written by Samuel Alito. They said it on April 29, 2026 — sixty-one years, almost to the month, after Bloody Sunday on the Edmund Pettus Bridge.

Then the Supreme Court of Virginia tossed out the redistricting amendment Virginia voters passed at the ballot. Then yesterdaySaturday, May 16, 2026the federal Supreme Court refused to put Virginia's voter-approved plan back.

Within ten days of the Louisiana ruling, Tennessee Republicans drew a brand-new map that erased the state's only majority-Black congressional district, the one centered in Memphis. That map is already in federal court. Its drafters' floor speeches are already exhibits in the discovery file.

This is not three coincidences. This is one demolition with three crews.

This is too much for one letter. So this is Part 1 of 2. Today: the ruling itself, and the human face on it. Tomorrow: the machine that built the case — the lawyers, the funders, the justices, the gutted Justice Department, and the cascade in motion. If you want the receipt-by-receipt walk-through of who paid for what and who was confirmed by whom, that's Part 2.

★ Companion Long-Form InvestigationThe Callais InvestigationTwelve plaintiffs. Five lawyers. Nine amici. One funder coalition. One gutted Justice Department. The full receipts wall — 18,000 words, every name, every dollar.Read The Full Investigation →

What 1965 Paid For

The Voting Rights Act was not given. It was paid for. It was paid for by John Lewis getting his skull cracked on a bridge in Selma. It was paid for by Viola Liuzzo getting shot on a Lowndes County highway. It was paid for by Jimmie Lee Jackson, killed in Marion, Alabama, two weeks before the march. It was paid for by Medgar Evers in a driveway in Jackson. It was paid for by four little girls in a basement at 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham. It was paid for, and the receipt was a federal statute Lyndon Johnson signed on August 6, 1965.

A federal statute is what we have when the country fails its own promises. The whole point of the Voting Rights Act was that the people who run elections at the state level — sheriffs, registrars, secretaries of state, legislatures drawing maps — had proved they could not be trusted with the franchise. Not as a slur. As a finding of fact, in case after case, by federal court after federal court, on a record that filled thousands of pages.

The country had been told for a hundred years. It refused. In 1965, it listened.

April 29, 2026 took the load-bearing part. Section 2. The provision that said when an electoral system produces racially discriminatory results, that system violates federal law — even when the people running it claim they did not mean to. That was the load-bearing wall. The Court did not knock it down. The Court announced that any state which tries to comply with Section 2 by drawing a map that takes race into account — as Section 2 itself requireshas now committed a separate constitutional violation under the 14th Amendment.

The trap is clean. It is also the point.

You can win a Section 2 case. The Louisiana plaintiffs in Robinson v. Ardoin won theirs. They are real people. Press Robinson. Edgar Cage. Dorothy Nairne. Edwin Rene Soule. Alice Washington. Clee Earnest Lowe. Davante Lewis. Martha Davis. Ambrose Sims. Edward Galmon, Sr. Ciara Hart. Norris Henderson. Tramelle Howard. The NAACP Louisiana State Conference. The Power Coalition for Equity and Justice. They sued the State of Louisiana over a single-majority-Black congressional map. They won at trial. The Fifth Circuit affirmed. The Louisiana legislature passed Senate Bill 8 in response, drawing a second majority-Black district — exactly what the federal court order required.

And that compliance is what the Roberts Court has now ruled unconstitutional.

There is no map that survives both rounds. There is only the round we are now in.

The Plaintiff

The case the Court used to do this is called Louisiana v. Callais. The lead-named plaintiff is a man from Brusly, Louisiana — a small West Baton Rouge Parish town across the river from the capital — named Phillip "Bert" Callais.

The complaint called him and eleven co-plaintiffs "non-African-American voters." That phrase is the name they gave their own coalition. It is in the court record.

They sued the State of Louisiana over SB8, the very map Robinson had forced into existence, alleging that the second majority-Black district was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander under the 14th and 15th Amendments.

The Supreme Court agreed. 6 to 3.

So who is Bert Callais? Per Democracy Docket's exclusive published this month:

The biography: A veteran and a member of his local board of supervisors as of 2024.

Jan 6 and Jan 7: A man who was on the Capitol grounds January 6 and January 7, 2021, during the Stop the Steal protest aimed at blocking certification of the 2020 election. Photos and video on his own accounts. His caption: "It wasn't total chaos as the news will lead you to believe." He was not charged. He was there.

Defends Tina Peters: A man who publicly defends Tina Peters — the Mesa County, Colorado clerk convicted on seven charges, four of them felonies, for unauthorized access to election machines — and calls her wrongly persecuted "for exposing the truth." For the record: Colorado's Democratic governor commuted Peters's sentence on May 15, 2026 — two days before this issue went to print.

Musk amplification: A man who reposted Elon Musk's debunked noncitizen-voting claim, calling it "f#€king insane."

Calls the system rigged: A man who has publicly described the US voting system as "manipulated" and advocated hand-counted paper ballots as the "solution."

Tells his own defendants to decertify: A man who has, on his own X account, retweeted content tagging the Louisiana Secretary of State, Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill, and Governor Jeff Landry — three of the defendants in his own SCOTUS case — telling them to "Decertify all electronic voting systems NOW! Paper ballots! Hand-marked & counted NOW!"

▶ Video Receipt · @BertCallais (Wayback 2026-05-16)Bert Callais (lead Callais plaintiff) tells Louisiana officials to decertify their elections — on X, before the SCOTUS ruling.Watch On X →

The Court did not need to know any of this. The 6-3 majority did not write Bert Callais's name into the opinion. The Court does not have to. The Court only has to call him a "non-African-American voter" and let the legal-foundation network running the case do the rest.

He is the face of the lawsuit that ended Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. He is also a Jan 6 attendee who publicly defends a convicted voting-machine breacher and demands that the officials he is suing decertify their own elections.

The Other Eleven

"I wasn't aware that I was involved in a Supreme Court case."

That is a direct quote. It is from a co-plaintiff in Louisiana v. Callais. His name is Albert "Skip" Caissie Jr. He is 78 years old. He is a retired grocery-sales worker and a Coast Guard Reserve veteran. He told the New York Times that nobody told him his name was on the case caption. He guessed he might have responded — once — to "a direct mail piece" about a Louisiana redistricting challenge. He had no idea that response carried his name to a 6-3 ruling that gutted Section 2.

There are twelve named plaintiffs in Louisiana v. Callais:

One is a Jan 6 attendee who publicly defends a convicted voting-machine breacher and tells the officials he is suing to decertify their own elections.

One is a 78-year-old who did not know he was in a Supreme Court case.

Ten have, per the Times, "limited public profile."

This is the case that ended Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

A worn plaintiff's lectern in a small courtroom with a single sealed direct-mail envelope on top and a precarious stack of twelve identical unopened envelopes leaning beside it. Engraving-style editorial cartoon.
Twelve named plaintiffs. One Jan 6 attendee. One who didn't know. Ten with limited public profile.

This did not happen by accident. Twelve people in Brusly, Louisiana did not wake up one morning and decide together to undo the Voting Rights Act at the Supreme Court. A lawyer drove from Monroe to the Louisiana legislature in January 2024 and testified against the SB8 map. A second lawyer flew to Washington from Kansas City and argued the case twice in front of the Court. A 501(c)(3) in suburban Virginia maintains the litigation portfolio. A donor-advised fund in Alexandria writes the checks. A judicial-confirmation operation in Washington seated the six justices.

That is the part we will publish tomorrow. Part 2: The Network. It walks every receipt. The lawyer who has been litigating Louisiana redistricting for thirty-six years. The Kansas City partner whose docket is the Tea Party and Bradley Foundation and Cleta Mitchell client list. The man whose three dark-money vehicles drew the Texas, Tarrant County, Indiana, and now Tennessee maps. The funder coalition — Donors Trust, the Bradley Foundation, Art Pope — whose name appears under the bottom of every amicus brief. The Federalist Society co-chairman who personally ran the confirmation campaigns for five of the six justices in the majority. The seventy-percent gutting of the DOJ Civil Rights Division that left the Voting Rights Act without a lawyer at reargument.

Today is the ruling and the human face. Tomorrow is the architecture.

The Reader Assignment

No Ads. No Sponsors. No Softening.

We do not run ads in this newsletter. We will not soften a sentence in this letter for a sponsor or a foundation or a friend. That is the contract. If we ever break it, this issue is the evidence.

What we ask:

Forward this to one person. That is how Beehiiv's algorithm believes we are real.

Read Part 2 tomorrow. Same hour. Same place.

Copy this line and post it anywhere: "They're not rewriting history. They're replaying it. — Burn the Playbook."

Subscribe Free By Magic Link

The Work That Needs Doing

Every issue carries a Jobs section. Real openings at insurgent accountability orgs. No DCCC/DSCC/DLCC.

NAACP Legal Defense Fund (LDF). Janai Nelson's team carried the Robinson plaintiffs and consolidated their cause at SCOTUS. Open legal and policy roles.

Open LDF careers →

Power Coalition for Equity and Justice (Louisiana). Community organizing in Louisiana; the Robinson plaintiffs' organizational home.

Open Power Coalition →

Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Voting Rights Project — the litigation desk fighting Section 2 cases in real time.

Open Voting Rights Project →

Public Defender — Louisiana, Tennessee, Virginia, any redistricting-fight state. The franchise fight runs through the criminal-legal system in parallel. PD offices are hiring in every state on this list.

Open Govjobs →

The Verdict

The Voting Rights Act was not given. It was paid for. And the country that paid for it has just had it taken away in an Alito opinion authored on behalf of a coalition that includes a Jan 6 plaintiff, a 78-year-old who didn't know his name was on the case, and ten people the New York Times can't find.

This is not rewriting history. It is replaying it. With better lawyers, quieter rooms, and the same outcome on the other side.

Today is the ruling. Tomorrow is the architecture. Forward this to one person tonight, so the machine has at least one more witness when Part 2 lands.

May the bridges we burn light our paths forward.

— Michael Starr Hopkins · Burn the Playbook, Issue #33 · Part 1 of 2 · May 17, 2026 · Tomorrow: Part 2 — The Network.

Magic Link

If someone forwarded you this issue, skip the signup maze and join BTP here:

Subscribe By Magic Link

Forwarded this?

Burn the Playbook.

Subscribe By Magic Link

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading