For four years, Democratic staff swore Joe Biden was sharp. Now Republican staff swear Donald Trump is. The only thing that changed is the letter after the president’s name.

86 percent. Between July 13 and 17, 2026, Change Research asked 2,006 registered voters whether elected officials should publicly release regular health and cognitive evaluations. Eighty-six percent said yes, and 65 percent said strongly. Nine percent opposed. Democrats backed it 90 percent, Republicans 84, independents 76. Eighty-seven percent also wanted a formal process to remove an official who can no longer do the job. This is one of the few things 84 percent of Republicans and 90 percent of Democrats still agree on, and it does not exist.

Pew asked the question in October 2023. Seventy-nine percent of Americans favored a maximum age limit for federal elected officials, including 82 percent of Republicans and 76 percent of Democrats. Seventy-four percent wanted the same cap on Supreme Court justices. That was almost three years ago and nothing was built. In January 2025, Pew measured the new Congress: the median senator was 64.7 years old, the median House member 57.5. Then Arizona’s 7th District lost its vote in Congress for most of a year. Raul Grijalva died on March 13, 2025. The special election was held September 23. Adelita Grijalva was not sworn in until November 12, fifty days after voters chose her, because the House stayed in recess during the shutdown.

A chief of staff’s paycheck ends the day the boss’s job does. Nobody on a member’s payroll has ever been promoted for saying the boss is slipping. The second gear is seniority. House gavels are handed out largely by years served, so the rational career move is to stay until you die. Members do. Five members of this Congress have died in office: Sylvester Turner of Texas at 70, Raul Grijalva of Arizona at 77, Gerry Connolly of Virginia at 75, Doug LaMalfa of California at 65, and David Scott of Georgia at 80. Four Democrats, one Republican. The third gear is money, because party committees exist to protect incumbents. The fourth is access, because a reporter who writes that the president looked lost loses the room, and the room is the job. None of those four people are lying. They are being paid to see nothing.

In February 2024, as Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report described Biden’s memory as poor, the president’s aides discussed having the 81-year-old take a public cognitive test. They believed he would pass. They killed it anyway, because taking one at all would raise questions about his sharpness. Read that again. The test was not rejected because they feared the score. It was rejected because they feared the headline. Now flip it. On July 27, 2022, 54 House Republicans led by Rep. Ronny Jackson of Texas sent Biden a letter demanding he submit to a cognitive test immediately and publish the results. The letter’s own argument was that cognitive testing is routine and should apply regardless of party. It was addressed to a Democrat. On January 2, 2026, NPR reported that Trump, who turned 80 this year, said he had aced a recent test. The White House provided no details.

Under a White House that favors energy production on our home soil, Frontieras could unlock up to $2.1 trillion in energy potential.

With the ‘FASF’ ticker reserved on the Nasdaq and over $45 million raised from investors, Frontieras is positioned to become a major leader in the space. Invest in Frontieras before the opportunity ends 8/27.

Invest Now

^{Frontieras is offering securities through the use of an Offering Statement that has been qualified by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Tier II of Regulation A. A copy of the Final Offering Circular that forms a part of the Offering Statement may be obtained from: invest.frontieras.com.  Reservation of the ticker symbol is not a guarantee that we will be listed on the NASDAQ. Listing on the NASDAQ is subject to approvals.   Sources* The global market for our products is worth a combined value of over $2.1 trillion.}

The spin is that this is ageism, and that competence is not a birthday. That argument is real, and it is the strongest one there is. Plenty of 78-year-olds run circles around 48-year-olds. A hard cap would end good careers at their peak on nothing but arithmetic. Here is the honest read. That is exactly why the number that travels is 86 and not the age-limit number. Voters are not leading with a birthday cutoff. They are leading with a test. A standard like that catches a 55-year-old with a brain injury and clears a 79-year-old who is fine. It is the opposite of ageism. It is the thing ageism gets substituted for when nobody will build it. Neither party will build it, not because it is unfair, but because a standard produces a result, and a result cannot be spun.

They did not refuse the test because they feared the score. They refused it because they feared the headline.

The denial playbook is not a Democratic product or a Republican one. It is a staff product. It runs on people whose income depends on the answer being fine. Democrats ran it on Biden and lost an election over it. Republicans called that a scandal, then ran the same play on an 80-year-old president inside of a year. Voters settled this a long time ago. Eighty-six percent want a test. Eighty-seven percent want a way to remove someone who fails one. The reason it does not exist is that everyone with the power to build it would be the first person measured by it. Watch for the bill number. Not the speech, not the clip of somebody looking tired. The bill number.

Government reform needs lawyers, policy analysts, researchers, legislative staff, and journalists who can track a bill number instead of a soundbite.

Issue One: careers in bipartisan political reform and government accountability.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW): careers in government ethics, oversight, and accountability litigation.

Demand Progress: jobs in congressional transparency, civil liberties, and institutional reform.

Republic Report: get involved in tracking conflicts of interest and government accountability.

Manage preferences · Unsubscribe

Burn Notice: A standard nobody will write is not a disagreement about ageism. It is a job protection plan.